CO129-337 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1906 — Page 204

:

6

With these reservations, I concur in your view that the scheme proposed might well be given a trial. It would be most desirable that the collection should be intrusted to the Maritime Customs, and that, as you suggest, that Department should have control over the expenditure. You should use your best endeavours to have these suggestions carried through, and you might tell the Taotai plainly that, unless some safeguard is provided, I shall object to the tax being levied at all.

Towards the end of your despatch No. 16 you refer to the Treaty right of foreign shipping firms to effect the "necessary improvements themselves" in the Upper Yang-tsze, but I have to point out that this is not the correct interpretation of the Mackay Treaty; Article V of that Treaty merely states that, until improvements can be carried out, "steam-ship owners shall be allowed, subject to approval by the Imperial Maritime Customs, to erect, at their own expense, appliances for hauling through the rapids." There is some difference between the right to effect the "necessary improvements" and the right to erect "hauling appliances."

I have, &c.

(Signed)

ERNEST SATOW.

Office or Individual.

Foreign

1906

Rohich

Jest previous Paper.

to

HONG KONG

No. 9617

выша

(Subject.)

China Trade

RECE

201

DOMESTIC,

C O.

9617

*REE 20 AR 06

bopy desp from Peking forworking copies of memorials to the throne on sulgest

Fury of copper coiney.

(Minutes.)

0

31 483-2854-20M-1 1-5

ext saleequent Paper.

1556

For Fiddes

? Lond with punti

6119 ans

23/3

alone

Dr. 2

Sh2

Cir

.....

...